Every figure this model derived for GSL, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
6,850,000
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2024-12-31
cash
273,876,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2025-12-31
current assets
626,988,000
AssetsCurrent
2025-12-31
current liabilities
306,783,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2025-12-31
equity
1,801,084,000
StockholdersEquity
2025-12-31
interest expense
38,966,000
InterestAndDebtExpense
2025-12-31
ocf
528,299,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-12-31
revenue
766,451,000
Revenues
2025-12-31
sbc
13,964,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2025-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
GSL on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
74.51
current ratio
2.43
current ratio reported
2.04
deferred revenue growth
9.26
ebit cagr
16.34
ebit yoy
14.77
fcf margin
68.03
growth cv
0.94
interest cover
11.17
net debt ebitda
0.75
operating margin
56.77
owner earnings margin
66.21
revenue growth
7.79
revenue growth per share
7.79
roic
15.51
rule of 40
64.56
sbc pct revenue
1.82
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about GSL's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2025-12-31 (242 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: gross margin stability