Every figure this model derived for GRPS, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-09-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
12,216
PaymentsToAcquireProductiveAssets
2024-09-30
cash
509
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2025-09-30
current assets
340,123
AssetsCurrent
2025-09-30
current liabilities
4,719,609
LiabilitiesCurrent
2025-09-30
equity
-3,758,603
StockholdersEquity
2025-09-30
interest expense
244,136
InterestExpenseNonoperating
2025-09-30
ocf
-3,325,693
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-09-30
revenue
16,500
Revenues
2025-09-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
GRPS on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
current ratio
0.07
current ratio reported
0.07
dilution pct
24.3
growth cv
1.54
revenue growth
-96.04
revenue growth per share
-96.81
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about GRPS's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
WITHHELD: owner earnings margin, fcf margin, net margin, ocf margin -- owner earnings margin came out at -20,230% against a scale that tops out near 1,750%, which is arithmetic on a revenue figure of 16,500 rather than a margin. The figure is absent rather than corrected: there is no right value to put here.
presents no operating result, and rebuilding it from the statement missed the reported pre-tax profit by 537.12% of revenue, so it is refused rather than used
no operating income found in XBRL
no current stock compensation tagged; treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2026-01-14 (228 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 5 inputs could be computed (operating margin, roic, owner earnings, cash operating margin not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev ebit, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage
growth DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 4 inputs could be computed (sustained growth, margin trend, margin recent not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
3 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (quality, valuation, growth -- 75% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left