Every figure this model derived for GHG, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
37,344,465
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2025-12-31
cash
236,259,958
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2025-12-31
current assets
271,128,052
AssetsCurrent
2025-12-31
current liabilities
168,792,308
LiabilitiesCurrent
2025-12-31
equity
225,445,632
StockholdersEquity
2025-12-31
interest expense
1,093,167
InterestExpense
2025-12-31
ocf
40,221,570
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-12-31
revenue
156,919,448
Revenues
2025-12-31
sbc
0
ShareBasedCompensation
2023-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
GHG on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
12.45
current ratio
1.87
current ratio reported
1.61
deferred revenue growth
0.86
ebit cagr
-23.9
ebit yoy
-63.48
fcf margin
1.83
growth cv
4.78
interest cover
7.41
operating margin
5.16
owner earnings margin
1.83
revenue growth
-14.74
revenue growth per share
-14.74
roic
18.86
rpo growth
-9.83
rule of 40
-9.58
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about GHG's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no current stock compensation tagged (last tagged 2023-12-31); treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
gross profit not tagged; rebuilt from Revenues - CostOfGoodsAndServicesSold
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions