Every figure this model derived for FOXXW, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-03-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
68,336
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2025-06-30
cash
3,190,474
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-03-31
current assets
15,028,091
AssetsCurrent
2026-03-31
current liabilities
39,883,506
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-03-31
equity
-47,815,804
StockholdersEquity
2026-03-31
interest expense
10,948
InterestExpenseDebt
2026-03-31
ocf
-569,518
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-03-31
revenue
59,540,939
Revenues
2026-03-31
sbc
1,270,473
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-03-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
FOXXW on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-63.57
current ratio
0.38
current ratio reported
0.38
deferred revenue growth
0.0
dilution pct
86.21
fcf margin
-1.07
interest cover
-3577.71
operating margin
-65.78
owner earnings margin
-3.21
revenue growth
10.53
revenue growth per share
-40.64
rule of 40
-55.25
sbc pct revenue
2.13
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about FOXXW's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2026-05-11 (111 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality rests on 4 of 5 inputs; not tagged: roic
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: worst year
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: sustained growth