Every figure this model derived for FENC, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
0
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2014-09-30
cash
41,249,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
72,500,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
12,394,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
42,442,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
904,000
InterestExpenseDebt
2026-06-30
ocf
-2,040,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
59,221,000
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
7,505,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
FENC on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
10.77
current ratio
7.87
current ratio reported
5.85
deferred revenue growth
1183.06
dilution pct
4.7
fcf margin
-3.44
growth cv
0.95
interest cover
-1.24
operating margin
-1.9
owner earnings margin
-16.12
revenue growth
77.83
revenue growth per share
69.84
roic
-74.5
rule of 40
75.93
sbc pct revenue
12.67
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about FENC's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2014-09-30); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
gross profit last tagged 2023-12-31 and no cost of sales line to rebuild it from; dropped from durability
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: gross margin stability