Every figure this model derived for FCFS, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
54,906,000
PaymentsToAcquireProductiveAssets
2025-12-31
cash
172,298,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
2,018,712,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
413,119,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
2,321,792,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
137,715,000
InterestExpenseOperating
2026-06-30
ocf
672,853,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
4,120,337,000
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
21,950,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
FCFS on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
62.86
current ratio
6.31
current ratio reported
4.89
deferred revenue growth
15.57
dilution pct
-1.42
ebit cagr
10.91
ebit yoy
22.3
fcf margin
15.0
growth cv
1.1
interest cover
18.65
net debt ebitda
0.85
operating margin
62.33
owner earnings margin
14.46
revenue growth
21.61
revenue growth per share
23.36
roic
45.13
rule of 40
83.94
sbc pct revenue
0.53
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about FCFS's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no operating income tagged; derived as revenue minus OperatingExpenses
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions