Every figure this model derived for FANG, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
0
PaymentsToAcquireOtherProductiveAssets
2019-12-31
cash
462,000,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
2,650,000,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
5,678,000,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
37,900,000,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
244,000,000
InterestExpense
2025-12-31
ocf
10,143,000,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
17,102,000,000
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
77,000,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2025-09-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
FANG on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
38.49
current ratio
0.67
current ratio reported
0.47
deferred revenue growth
9.85
dilution pct
35.4
ebit cagr
-37.39
ebit yoy
-71.2
fcf margin
59.31
growth cv
1.07
interest cover
5.19
net debt ebitda
1.87
operating margin
7.4
owner earnings margin
58.86
revenue growth
21.45
revenue growth per share
-10.31
roic
2.0
rule of 40
28.85
sbc pct revenue
0.45
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about FANG's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
operating income is annual, not TTM
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2019-12-31); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: gross margin stability