Exodus Movement, Inc. (EXOD)

Every figure this model derived for EXOD, the value it took, and the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked against the filing rather than taken on trust. As at 2026-06-30.

The figures, and where each came from

This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.

The ratios

The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up EXOD on one particular measure came for.

Everything else this filing tags

217 more elements from EXOD's own XBRL that this model has no measure for, newest reading each, largest first. Nothing here is converted, added up or renamed — it is the filing's own element names and the filing's own numbers.

What to be careful about

What this model itself distrusts about EXOD's figures. Written by the derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.

• operating income last tagged 2024-09-30, 638 days before the revenue period (2026-06-30); dropped rather than divided by current revenue
• presents no operating result, and rebuilding it from the statement missed the reported pre-tax profit by 20.14% of revenue, so it is refused rather than used
• no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
• gross profit last tagged 2024-09-30 and no cost of sales line to rebuild it from; dropped from durability
• no debt and no profit, so interest cover cannot be measured; scored on cash runway instead: 21M of net cash against a 66M annual burn is 0.3 years
• analyst estimate not used: trailing EPS is not positive, so a growth rate would be meaningless
• quality DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 5 inputs could be computed (operating margin, roic, cash operating margin not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
• valuation rests on 1 of 2 inputs; not tagged: ev ebit
• durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
• growth DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 4 inputs could be computed (sustained growth, margin trend, margin recent not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
• 3 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (quality, durability, growth -- 60% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left