Every figure this model derived for EUBG, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
117,423
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2025-12-31
cash
13,723,995
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
11,222,642
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
750,785
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
10,547,285
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
ocf
1,578,194
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
5,061,882
Revenues
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
EUBG on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
42.12
current ratio
18.28
current ratio reported
14.95
dilution pct
0.0
ebit cagr
19.72
ebit yoy
-1.86
fcf margin
28.86
operating margin
41.53
owner earnings margin
28.86
revenue growth
4.26
revenue growth per share
4.26
rule of 40
45.78
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about EUBG's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no current stock compensation tagged; treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
invested capital is -3M (cash exceeds equity plus debt), so return on capital is unbounded rather than undefined; scored as maximal
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions