Every figure this model derived for ESE, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
ESE on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
22.47
current ratio
2.92
current ratio reported
1.38
deferred revenue growth
40.15
dilution pct
0.15
ebit cagr
13.89
ebit yoy
16.52
fcf margin
16.06
growth cv
1.05
interest cover
11.38
net debt ebitda
0.17
operating margin
13.2
owner earnings margin
15.06
revenue growth
27.01
revenue growth per share
26.82
roic
8.09
rpo growth
-0.2
rule of 40
40.21
sbc pct revenue
1.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about ESE's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
operating income is annual, not TTM
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
gross profit not tagged; rebuilt from RevenueFromContractWithCustomerExcludingAssessedTax - CostOfRevenue
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions