EQUINOR ASA (EQNR)

Every figure this model derived for EQNR, the value it took, and the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked against the filing rather than taken on trust. As at 2025-12-31.

The figures, and where each came from

This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.

Figure	Value	XBRL tag	As at
capex	13,994,000,000	`PurchaseOfPropertyPlantAndEquipmentClassifiedAsInvestingActivities`	2025-12-31
cash	5,036,000,000	`CashAndCashEquivalents`	2025-12-31
current assets	60,990,000,000	`CurrentAssets`	2023-12-31
current liabilities	35,719,000,000	`CurrentLiabilities`	2023-12-31
equity	40,424,000,000	`EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParent`	2025-12-31
interest expense	665,000,000	`InterestPaidClassifiedAsOperatingActivities`	2025-12-31
ocf	19,971,000,000	`CashFlowsFromUsedInOperatingActivities`	2025-12-31
revenue	105,828,000,000	`RevenueFromSaleOfOilAndGasProducts`	2025-12-31

The ratios

The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up EQNR on one particular measure came for.

Ratio	Value
cash operating margin	33.25
current ratio	1.71
current ratio reported	1.71
dilution pct	-8.0
ebit cagr	-6.84
fcf margin	5.65
growth cv	1.75
interest cover	38.12
net debt ebitda	0.7
operating margin	23.96
owner earnings margin	5.65
roic	30.86
sbc pct revenue	0.0

What to be careful about

What this model itself distrusts about EQNR's figures. Written by the derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.

no current stock compensation tagged; treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2025-12-31 (242 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
gross profit not tagged; rebuilt from RevenueFromSaleOfOilAndGasProducts - CostOfSales
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage
growth DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (revenue growth, margin recent not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, growth -- 45% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left