Every figure this model derived for EPRT, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
0
PaymentsToAcquireProductiveAssets
2018-12-31
cash
126,165,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
equity
4,408,411,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
119,508,000
InterestExpenseNonoperating
2026-06-30
ocf
414,070,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
615,487,000
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
13,345,000
AllocatedShareBasedCompensationExpense
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
EPRT on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
91.22
dilution pct
11.83
ebit cagr
25.35
ebit yoy
22.15
fcf margin
67.28
growth cv
0.22
interest cover
3.23
net debt ebitda
5.12
operating margin
62.8
owner earnings margin
65.11
revenue growth
22.3
revenue growth per share
9.36
roic
4.23
rule of 40
85.1
sbc pct revenue
2.17
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about EPRT's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2018-12-31); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
gross profit not tagged; rebuilt from Revenues - CostOfPropertyRepairsAndMaintenance
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage
resilience rests on 2 of 3 inputs; not tagged: liquidity