Every figure this model derived for EOG, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
580,000,000
PaymentsToAcquireOtherPropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-06-30
cash
4,907,000,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
9,877,000,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
5,335,000,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
31,864,000,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
270,000,000
InterestExpenseNonoperating
2026-06-30
ocf
13,358,000,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
27,026,000,000
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
231,000,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
EOG on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
51.74
current ratio
1.85
current ratio reported
1.85
dilution pct
-4.04
ebit cagr
-3.17
ebit yoy
22.2
fcf margin
47.28
growth cv
1.58
interest cover
32.98
net debt ebitda
0.23
operating margin
32.95
owner earnings margin
46.43
revenue growth
19.07
revenue growth per share
24.09
roic
20.1
rule of 40
52.02
sbc pct revenue
0.85
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about EOG's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (contracted coverage, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability -- 35% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left