Every figure this model derived for ENB, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
10,764,000,000
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-06-30
cash
2,012,000,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
17,720,000,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
24,577,000,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
65,349,000,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
5,125,000,000
InterestExpenseNonoperating
2026-06-30
ocf
12,432,000,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
83,491,000,000
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
285,000,000
AllocatedShareBasedCompensationExpense
2025-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
ENB on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
20.53
current ratio
0.72
current ratio reported
0.72
deferred revenue growth
23.8
dilution pct
1.3
fcf margin
2.0
interest cover
2.17
net debt ebitda
6.11
operating margin
13.33
owner earnings margin
1.66
revenue growth
29.49
revenue growth per share
27.83
roic
5.22
rpo growth
-3.03
rule of 40
42.82
sbc pct revenue
0.34
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about ENB's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
reports in CAD and no currency is recorded for its share price, so the two cannot be shown to match. The price refresh records one; until it has run for this company the multiples are left out rather than assumed comparable
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, gross margin stability, cash flow stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 4 inputs could be computed (sustained growth, margin trend, margin recent not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
3 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability, growth -- 55% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left