Every figure this model derived for ELOX, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
0
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2023-09-30
cash
68,729,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
63,388,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
16,968,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
46,420,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
25,000
InterestPaidNet
2025-12-31
ocf
-6,327,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-12-31
revenue
0
Revenues
2025-12-31
sbc
235,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2025-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
ELOX on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
current ratio
3.74
current ratio reported
3.74
dilution pct
228.76
growth cv
2.32
interest cover
-257.52
revenue growth
-100.0
revenue growth per share
-100.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about ELOX's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2023-09-30); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 5 inputs could be computed (operating margin, roic, sbc discipline, owner earnings, cash operating margin not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 4 inputs could be computed (contracted coverage, gross margin stability, cash flow stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (margin trend, margin recent not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
4 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (quality, valuation, durability, growth -- 85% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left