ESTEE LAUDER COMPANIES INC (EL)

Every figure below is the company's own, as filed. Nothing is estimated and nothing is smoothed — a period the filing does not support is left blank rather than drawn. Quarters are the company's own, counted from its financial year ending 06-30. Amounts in USD.

2Y 5Y 10Y All
Quarterly Annual TTM

Revenue Annual

0 7B 14B 21B FY22: 17.7B FY23: 15.9B FY24: 15.6B FY25: 14.3B FY26: 15B FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26

Gross Profit Annual

0 5B 10B 15B FY22: 13.4B FY23: 11.3B FY24: 11.2B FY25: 10.6B FY26: 11.4B FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26

Operating Income Annual

-1.5B 0 1.5B 3B 4.5B FY22: 3.2B FY23: 1.5B FY24: 970M FY25: -785M FY26: 780M FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26

Net Income Annual

-1.8B -900M 0 900M 1.8B 2.7B FY22: 2.4B FY23: 1B FY24: 409M FY25: -1.1B FY26: 182M FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26

Cost of Revenue Annual

0 2B 4B 6B FY22: 4.3B FY23: 4.6B FY24: 4.4B FY25: 3.7B FY26: 3.7B FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26

Operating Cash Flow Annual

0 1.5B 3B 4.5B FY22: 3B FY23: 1.7B FY24: 2.4B FY25: 1.3B FY26: 1.8B FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26

Free Cash Flow Annual

0 700M 1.4B 2.1B FY22: 2B FY23: 728M FY24: 1.4B FY25: 670M FY26: 1.3B FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26

Operating cash flow minus capital expenditure.

Shares Outstanding Annual

0 150M 300M 450M FY22: 364.9M FY23: 360.9M FY24: 360.8M FY25: 360.1M FY26: 364.8M FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26

Weighted average diluted, as the filer reports it for each period. An average cannot be added across periods, so this one is always shown per period the filer tagged rather than as a trailing year.

EPS TTM

-3.50 0.00 3.50 7.00 10.50 Q4 '20: 1.83 Q1 '21: 1.64 Q2 '21: 2.49 Q3 '21: 3.75 Q4 '21: 7.79 Q1 '22: 8.25 Q2 '22: 8.85 Q3 '22: 9.14 Q4 '22: 6.54 Q1 '23: 6.01 Q2 '23: 4.13 Q3 '23: 3.03 Q4 '23: 2.78 Q1 '24: 1.52 Q2 '24: 1.30 Q3 '24: 1.78 Q4 '25: -3.15 Q1 '26: -2.59 Q2 '26: -0.51 Q3 '26: -0.71 Q1 '21 Q4 '21 Q3 '22 Q2 '23 Q1 '24 Q4 '25 Q3 '26

The filer's own published earnings a share for each quarter, four quarters added up. The company page divides trailing net income by the share count instead, which lands within about 1% of this and is not the same sum, so the two are named differently rather than presented as one figure.