Every figure this model derived for DXR, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2011-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
123,150
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2011-12-31
cash
59,625
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2011-12-31
current assets
81,686,352
AssetsCurrent
2011-12-31
current liabilities
49,264,316
LiabilitiesCurrent
2011-12-31
equity
36,216,591
StockholdersEquity
2011-12-31
interest expense
175,348
InterestPaid
2011-12-31
ocf
-6,508,648
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2011-12-31
revenue
1,446,345
Revenues
2011-12-31
sbc
9,731
ShareBasedCompensation
2011-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
DXR on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-379.29
current ratio
1.66
current ratio reported
1.66
fcf margin
-458.52
interest cover
-33.0
operating margin
-400.07
owner earnings margin
-459.19
revenue growth
-8.42
revenue growth per share
-8.42
roic
-12.64
rule of 40
-408.49
sbc pct revenue
0.67
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about DXR's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
newest fact in the filing is 2011-12-31 (14y old); this company's data is not usable and the scores below should be ignored
revenue period ends 2011-12-31 (5356 days ago) - the tag chain found nothing recent, so treat this row as unscored
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, contracted coverage, gross margin stability, cash flow stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: sustained growth
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability -- 35% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left