Every figure this model derived for DTST, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
16,024
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2025-12-31
cash
9,279,605
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
10,997,822
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
2,024,677
LiabilitiesCurrent
2025-12-31
equity
10,329,060
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
115,733
InterestExpenseNonoperating
2025-06-30
ocf
-5,079,704
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
1,447,471
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
1,759,067
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
DTST on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-187.25
current ratio
6.12
current ratio reported
5.43
deferred revenue growth
8.74
dilution pct
4.93
fcf margin
-352.04
growth cv
6.61
interest cover
-38.67
operating margin
-309.16
owner earnings margin
-473.57
roic
-336.86
sbc pct revenue
121.53
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about DTST's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: revenue growth