Every figure this model derived for DPZ, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-28.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
120,558,000
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2025-12-28
cash
164,836,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-14
current assets
905,419,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-14
current liabilities
588,670,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-14
equity
-3,982,431,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-14
interest expense
195,972,000
InterestExpense
2025-12-28
ocf
792,062,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-12-28
revenue
4,939,994,000
Revenues
2025-12-28
sbc
44,640,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2025-12-28
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
DPZ on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
22.01
current ratio
1.55
current ratio reported
1.54
deferred revenue growth
-2.0
dilution pct
-2.16
ebit cagr
5.17
ebit yoy
8.53
fcf margin
13.59
growth cv
0.69
interest cover
4.87
operating margin
19.31
owner earnings margin
12.69
revenue growth
4.96
revenue growth per share
7.28
rpo growth
-17.32
rule of 40
24.27
sbc pct revenue
0.9
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about DPZ's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
invested capital is -4,007M (cash exceeds equity plus debt), so return on capital is unbounded rather than undefined; scored as maximal
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions