Every figure this model derived for DPU, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
10,052
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2025-12-31
cash
13,085,466
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2025-12-31
current assets
33,237,438
AssetsCurrent
2025-12-31
current liabilities
2,992,875
LiabilitiesCurrent
2025-12-31
equity
30,330,094
StockholdersEquity
2025-12-31
interest expense
74,190
InterestExpenseDebt
2024-12-31
ocf
-1,296,079
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-12-31
revenue
8,038,370
Revenues
2025-12-31
sbc
3,381,800
ShareBasedCompensation
2025-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
DPU on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-258.48
current ratio
12.98
current ratio reported
11.11
deferred revenue growth
-11.67
dilution pct
325.69
fcf margin
-16.25
growth cv
1.58
interest cover
-326.78
operating margin
-301.6
owner earnings margin
-58.32
revenue growth
114.34
revenue growth per share
-49.65
roic
-111.06
rule of 40
-187.26
sbc pct revenue
42.07
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about DPU's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2025-12-31 (242 days old, weighted average diluted); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions