Every figure this model derived for DOW, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-03-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
DOW on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
3.55
current ratio
1.89
current ratio reported
1.85
deferred revenue growth
3.86
dilution pct
0.92
fcf margin
-0.59
growth cv
7.76
interest cover
-1.84
net debt ebitda
10.73
operating margin
-4.0
owner earnings margin
-0.98
revenue growth
-7.74
revenue growth per share
-8.58
roic
-4.42
rpo growth
-23.67
rule of 40
-11.74
sbc pct revenue
0.39
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about DOW's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
presents no operating result; summing the costs it tags misses its own pre-tax profit by 7.3% of revenue, far more than interest can explain, so a cost line it does not tag is missing and the sum was refused rather than used
presents no operating result; rebuilt from its own income statement as revenue minus Cost of sales; Research and development expenses; Selling, general and administrative expenses; Amortization of intangibles; Restructuring, goodwill impairment and asset related charges - net; Equity in losses of nonconsolidated affiliates; Sundry income (expense) - net. Checked: revenue minus every presented line lands within 0.26% of the -2,511M pre-tax profit it reports. Covers the annual to 2025-12-31, 90 days before the revenue period, so the margin uses that window's own revenue
operating income is annual, not TTM
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2026-03-31 (152 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
gross profit not tagged since 2020-12-31; rebuilt from RevenueFromContractWithCustomerIncludingAssessedTax - CostOfGoodsAndServicesSold
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (margin trend, margin recent not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, growth -- 45% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left