Every figure this model derived for DOMH, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
0
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2023-12-31
cash
71,560,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
206,328,000
AssetsCurrent
2025-09-30
current liabilities
7,491,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2025-09-30
equity
21,840,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
11,000
InterestPaidNet
2026-06-30
ocf
-17,006,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
133,493,000
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
33,978,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2025-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
DOMH on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-6.73
current ratio
48.08
current ratio reported
27.54
deferred revenue growth
633.94
dilution pct
131.16
fcf margin
-12.74
growth cv
1.87
interest cover
-3914.0
operating margin
-32.25
owner earnings margin
-38.19
revenue growth
124.04
revenue growth per share
-3.08
rule of 40
91.79
sbc pct revenue
25.45
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about DOMH's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2023-12-31); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
gross profit last tagged 2013-06-30 and no cost of sales line to rebuild it from; dropped from durability
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality rests on 4 of 5 inputs; not tagged: roic
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: gross margin stability
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: margin trend