Every figure this model derived for DEC, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
184,600,000
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2025-12-31
cash
8,238,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
551,518,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
969,846,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
950,691,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
217,564,000
InterestExpenseDebt
2025-12-31
ocf
464,619,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-12-31
revenue
2,005,341,000
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
10,398,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2025-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
DEC on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
53.65
current ratio
0.76
current ratio reported
0.57
dilution pct
55.11
fcf margin
13.96
growth cv
1.82
interest cover
3.0
net debt ebitda
2.81
operating margin
32.56
owner earnings margin
13.45
roic
13.08
sbc pct revenue
0.52
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about DEC's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
gross profit last tagged 2024-12-31 and no cost of sales line to rebuild it from; dropped from durability
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: gross margin stability
growth DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (revenue growth, margin recent not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, growth -- 45% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left