Every figure this model derived for DDC, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
4,575
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2025-12-31
cash
21,667,289
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2025-12-31
current assets
83,673,569
AssetsCurrent
2025-12-31
current liabilities
95,526,733
LiabilitiesCurrent
2025-12-31
equity
71,221,156
StockholdersEquity
2025-12-31
interest expense
2,923,190
InterestExpense
2025-12-31
ocf
-39,695,734
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-12-31
revenue
39,187,285
Revenues
2025-12-31
sbc
31,221,194
ShareBasedCompensation
2025-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
DDC on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-9.68
current ratio
0.89
current ratio reported
0.88
deferred revenue growth
17.87
fcf margin
-101.31
interest cover
-12.07
operating margin
-90.03
owner earnings margin
-180.98
revenue growth
4.65
revenue growth per share
4.65
roic
-56.15
rule of 40
-85.38
sbc pct revenue
79.67
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about DDC's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: worst year
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: sustained growth