Every figure this model derived for DAVE, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
404,000
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-06-30
cash
252,592,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
519,100,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
122,931,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
207,890,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
7,257,000
InterestExpense
2026-06-30
ocf
326,946,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
643,653,000
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
37,500,000
AllocatedShareBasedCompensationExpense
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
DAVE on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
41.54
current ratio
4.22
current ratio reported
4.22
dilution pct
4.76
ebit yoy
122.7
fcf margin
50.73
growth cv
0.33
interest cover
30.62
operating margin
34.52
owner earnings margin
44.91
revenue growth
48.63
revenue growth per share
41.87
roic
118.26
rule of 40
83.15
sbc pct revenue
5.83
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about DAVE's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
operating income last tagged 2021-12-31, 1642 days before the revenue period (2026-06-30); dropped rather than divided by current revenue
no operating income tagged; derived as revenue minus OperatingExpenses
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (contracted coverage, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability -- 35% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left