Every figure this model derived for CVR, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
427,120
PaymentsToAcquireProductiveAssets
2026-06-30
cash
770,752
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
12,978,056
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
4,282,220
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
17,452,775
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
43,994
InterestPaidNet
2026-06-30
ocf
-993,006
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
27,434,689
Revenues
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
CVR on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-3.96
current ratio
3.11
current ratio reported
3.03
deferred revenue growth
-42.66
dilution pct
0.0
fcf margin
-5.18
growth cv
13.05
interest cover
-51.48
operating margin
-8.26
owner earnings margin
-5.18
revenue growth
7.09
revenue growth per share
7.09
roic
-10.73
rpo growth
-5.35
rule of 40
-1.16
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about CVR's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no current stock compensation tagged; treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions