Every figure this model derived for CTGG, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-03-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
736,000,000
PaymentsToAcquireProductiveAssets
2026-03-31
cash
56,000,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-03-31
current assets
4,453,000,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-03-31
current liabilities
640,000,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-03-31
equity
10,690,000,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-03-31
interest expense
95,000,000
InterestPaidNet
2026-03-31
ocf
1,573,000,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-03-31
revenue
4,577,000,000
Revenues
2026-03-31
sbc
0
AllocatedShareBasedCompensationExpense
2011-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
CTGG on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-15.42
current ratio
9.64
current ratio reported
6.96
deferred revenue growth
15.58
fcf margin
18.29
interest cover
-14.21
operating margin
-29.5
owner earnings margin
18.29
revenue growth
-14.26
revenue growth per share
-14.26
roic
-8.65
rpo growth
-19.05
rule of 40
-43.75
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about CTGG's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no current stock compensation tagged (last tagged 2011-12-31); treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2026-03-31 (152 days old, balance sheet); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
gross profit not tagged; rebuilt from Revenues - CostOfGoodsAndServicesSold
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions