Every figure this model derived for CSTM, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-03-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
CSTM on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
14.57
current ratio
1.45
current ratio reported
1.39
dilution pct
-4.1
fcf margin
1.91
growth cv
49.88
interest cover
9.15
net debt ebitda
1.43
operating margin
10.55
owner earnings margin
1.65
revenue growth
20.14
revenue growth per share
25.27
roic
25.23
rule of 40
30.68
sbc pct revenue
0.27
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about CSTM's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
presents no operating result; summed as revenue minus the costs it does tag (CostOfGoodsAndServiceExcludingDepreciationDepletionAndAmortization, SellingGeneralAndAdministrativeExpense, ResearchAndDevelopmentExpense). Checked against the company's own figures: the answer lands 3.6% of revenue from the 618M pre-tax profit it reports, which is its interest and other non-operating items
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2026-03-31 (152 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
gross profit not tagged; rebuilt from RevenueFromContractWithCustomerExcludingAssessedTax - CostOfGoodsAndServiceExcludingDepreciationDepletionAndAmortization - dep_amort
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 4 inputs could be computed (sustained growth, margin trend, margin recent not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, growth -- 45% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left