Every figure this model derived for CRE, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
92,164
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2025-12-31
cash
7,029,041
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2025-12-31
current assets
10,943,515
AssetsCurrent
2025-12-31
current liabilities
6,949,205
LiabilitiesCurrent
2025-12-31
equity
6,608,743
StockholdersEquity
2025-12-31
interest expense
32,241
InterestExpenseNonoperating
2025-12-31
ocf
1,482,193
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-12-31
revenue
16,822,196
Revenues
2025-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
CRE on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
4.77
current ratio
2.08
current ratio reported
1.57
deferred revenue growth
57.16
dilution pct
3.26
ebit cagr
-29.11
ebit yoy
-29.11
fcf margin
8.26
interest cover
23.37
operating margin
4.48
owner earnings margin
8.26
revenue growth
25.86
revenue growth per share
21.89
rule of 40
30.34
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about CRE's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no current stock compensation tagged; treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2025-12-31 (242 days old, weighted average diluted); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
invested capital is -0M (cash exceeds equity plus debt), so return on capital is unbounded rather than undefined; scored as maximal
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, gross margin stability, cash flow stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: sustained growth
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability -- 35% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left