Every figure this model derived for CNH, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
CNH on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
0.6
dilution pct
-0.71
fcf margin
11.53
growth cv
3.93
interest cover
-0.15
operating margin
-1.42
owner earnings margin
11.24
revenue growth
0.96
revenue growth per share
1.69
roic
-2.92
rpo growth
51.61
rule of 40
-0.46
sbc pct revenue
0.29
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about CNH's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
operating income last tagged 2017-12-31, 3103 days before the revenue period (2026-06-30); dropped rather than divided by current revenue
presents no operating result; summed as revenue minus the costs it does tag (CostOfRevenue, SellingGeneralAndAdministrativeExpense, ResearchAndDevelopmentExpense). Checked against the company's own figures: the answer lands 3.8% of revenue from the 368M pre-tax profit it reports, which is its interest and other non-operating items
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2017-03-31); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
gross profit not tagged; rebuilt from RevenueFromContractWithCustomerExcludingAssessedTax - CostOfRevenue
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
resilience rests on 2 of 3 inputs; not tagged: liquidity
growth DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (margin trend, margin recent not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, growth -- 45% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left