Every figure this model derived for CNFN, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
0
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-03-31
cash
103,525
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-03-31
current assets
310,158
AssetsCurrent
2026-03-31
current liabilities
25,139,697
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-03-31
equity
-24,577,098
StockholdersEquity
2026-03-31
interest expense
220,240
InterestExpense
2026-03-31
ocf
-276,408
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-03-31
revenue
36,297
Revenues
2025-12-31
sbc
0
AllocatedShareBasedCompensationExpense
2024-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
CNFN on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
current ratio
0.01
current ratio reported
0.01
deferred revenue growth
9.07
fcf margin
-761.52
growth cv
3.18
interest cover
-11.11
owner earnings margin
-761.52
revenue growth
-88.7
revenue growth per share
-88.7
rule of 40
-6828.0
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about CNFN's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
WITHHELD: operating margin, cash operating margin, net margin, ebitda margin -- net margin came out at -14,245% against a scale that tops out near 1,500%, which is arithmetic on a revenue figure of 36,297 rather than a margin. The figure is absent rather than corrected: there is no right value to put here.
revenue is annual, not TTM
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2026-05-19 (103 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 5 inputs could be computed (operating margin, roic, cash operating margin not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (quality, valuation -- 55% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left