Every figure this model derived for CNBX, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-05-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
0
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2016-05-31
cash
9,487
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-05-31
current assets
12,795
AssetsCurrent
2026-05-31
current liabilities
2,672,509
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-05-31
equity
-2,659,714
StockholdersEquity
2026-05-31
interest expense
46,181
InterestExpenseDebt
2026-02-28
ocf
-154,169
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-05-31
revenue
0
Revenues
2026-05-31
sbc
0
ShareBasedCompensation
2025-11-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
CNBX on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
current ratio
0.0
current ratio reported
0.0
growth cv
2.76
interest cover
-9.3
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about CNBX's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2016-05-31); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
diluted share count moved +200% in a year (30M to 91M, a ratio of 3.00), which is a stock split rather than issuance; growth is measured on total revenue, not per share
gross profit last tagged 2017-08-31 and no cost of sales line to rebuild it from; dropped from durability
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 5 inputs could be computed (operating margin, roic, sbc discipline, owner earnings, cash operating margin not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (contracted coverage, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 4 inputs could be computed (revenue growth, sustained growth, margin trend, margin recent not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
4 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (quality, valuation, durability, growth -- 85% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left