Every figure this model derived for CBL, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
cash
101,280,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
equity
427,436,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
170,393,000
InterestExpenseNonoperating
2026-06-30
ocf
282,921,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
588,147,000
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
13,330,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
CBL on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
55.7
dilution pct
-0.39
ebit cagr
41.98
ebit yoy
25.59
fcf margin
48.1
interest cover
0.94
net debt ebitda
12.39
operating margin
27.2
owner earnings margin
45.84
revenue growth
9.03
revenue growth per share
9.45
roic
2.92
rpo growth
10.01
rule of 40
36.23
sbc pct revenue
2.27
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about CBL's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
operating income last tagged 2018-09-30, 2830 days before the revenue period (2026-06-30); dropped rather than divided by current revenue
no operating income tagged; derived as revenue minus CostsAndExpenses
no current capital expenditure tagged; treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
gross profit not tagged; rebuilt from Revenues - CostOfOtherPropertyOperatingExpense
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
resilience rests on 2 of 3 inputs; not tagged: liquidity