Every figure this model derived for CAPC, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2024-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
42,970
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2023-12-31
cash
194,596
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
204,527
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
840,789
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
-636,262
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
14,000
InterestExpense
2024-12-31
revenue
143,269
Revenues
2024-12-31
sbc
0
AllocatedShareBasedCompensationExpense
2025-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
CAPC on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
current ratio
0.24
current ratio reported
0.24
dilution pct
0.0
revenue growth
-25.45
revenue growth per share
-25.45
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about CAPC's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
operating income last tagged 2026-06-30, -546 days before the revenue period (2024-12-31); dropped rather than divided by current revenue
presents no operating result; it could be summed from the costs it tags, but the company reports no pre-tax profit for the same period to check that sum against, so it was left out rather than guessed
operating cash flow last tagged 2026-06-30, -546 days before the revenue period (2024-12-31); dropped rather than divided by current revenue
revenue period ends 2024-12-31 (607 days ago) - the tag chain found nothing recent, so treat this row as unscored
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 5 inputs could be computed (operating margin, roic, owner earnings, cash operating margin not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev ebit, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage
resilience rests on 2 of 3 inputs; not tagged: interest cover
growth DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (margin trend, margin recent not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
3 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (quality, valuation, growth -- 75% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left