Every figure this model derived for CAMT, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
14,396,000
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2025-12-31
cash
256,710,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2025-12-31
current assets
896,995,000
AssetsCurrent
2025-12-31
current liabilities
107,425,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2025-12-31
equity
617,003,000
StockholdersEquity
2025-12-31
ocf
141,871,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-12-31
revenue
496,072,000
Revenues
2025-12-31
sbc
16,892,000
AllocatedShareBasedCompensationExpense
2025-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
CAMT on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
31.62
current ratio
12.85
current ratio reported
8.35
deferred revenue growth
41.51
dilution pct
1.22
ebit cagr
15.96
ebit yoy
18.63
fcf margin
25.7
growth cv
0.89
net debt ebitda
1.92
operating margin
25.84
owner earnings margin
22.29
revenue growth
15.57
revenue growth per share
14.18
roic
11.44
rule of 40
41.42
sbc pct revenue
3.41
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about CAMT's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2025-12-31 (242 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
resilience rests on 2 of 3 inputs; not tagged: interest cover
no interest expense tagged while 525M of debt is on the balance sheet, so interest cover is unmeasured rather than perfect