Every figure this model derived for C, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
C on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
dilution pct
-3.46
ev owner earnings
-2.67
ev sales
2.33
fcf margin
-87.01
growth cv
1.48
owner earnings margin
-87.01
revenue growth
5.58
revenue growth per share
9.36
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about C's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no operating income found in XBRL
no current stock compensation tagged (last tagged 2012-12-31); treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no debt and no profit, so interest cover cannot be measured; scored on cash runway instead: 33,752M of net cash against a 74,152M annual burn is 0.5 years
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 5 inputs could be computed (operating margin, roic, cash operating margin not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
valuation rests on 1 of 2 inputs; not tagged: ev ebit
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (contracted coverage, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
resilience rests on 2 of 3 inputs; not tagged: liquidity
growth DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (margin trend, margin recent not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
3 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (quality, durability, growth -- 60% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left