Every figure this model derived for BUR, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
253,000
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-06-30
cash
1,073,999,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
equity
819,059,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
176,276,000
InterestExpenseDebt
2026-06-30
ocf
-184,606,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
-1,506,476,000
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
13,841,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2025-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
BUR on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
dilution pct
0.6
growth cv
2.64
interest cover
1.32
net debt ebitda
5.73
revenue growth
-330.95
revenue growth per share
-329.57
roic
8.54
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about BUR's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
WITHHELD: every margin -- revenue is -1,506,476,000, and a share of a negative total is not a share. Divided into a negative result it produced a confident positive, which is the reading this withholds. The margins are absent rather than corrected: there is no right value to put here.
operating income is annual, not TTM
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 5 inputs could be computed (operating margin, sbc discipline, owner earnings, cash operating margin not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (contracted coverage, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
resilience rests on 2 of 3 inputs; not tagged: liquidity
growth DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (margin trend, margin recent not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
4 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (quality, valuation, durability, growth -- 85% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left