Every figure this model derived for BUKS, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-04-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
BUKS on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
36.25
current ratio
2.57
current ratio reported
2.14
deferred revenue growth
-6.08
dilution pct
-4.23
ebit cagr
15.25
ebit yoy
69.09
fcf margin
19.64
growth cv
0.55
interest cover
14.72
net debt ebitda
0.09
operating margin
29.04
owner earnings margin
19.44
revenue growth
16.67
revenue growth per share
21.83
roic
26.39
rule of 40
45.72
sbc pct revenue
0.2
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about BUKS's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
gross profit last tagged 2012-01-31 and no cost of sales line to rebuild it from; dropped from durability
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: gross margin stability