Bit Origin Ltd (BTOG)

Every figure this model derived for BTOG, the value it took, and the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked against the filing rather than taken on trust. As at 2025-06-30.

The figures, and where each came from

This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.

The ratios

The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up BTOG on one particular measure came for.

Everything else this filing tags

307 more elements from BTOG's own XBRL that this model has no measure for, newest reading each, largest first. Nothing here is converted, added up or renamed — it is the filing's own element names and the filing's own numbers.

What to be careful about

What this model itself distrusts about BTOG's figures. Written by the derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.

• WITHHELD: operating margin, cash operating margin, owner earnings margin, fcf margin, net margin, ocf margin, ebitda margin -- net margin came out at -11,064% against a scale that tops out near 1,500%, which is arithmetic on a revenue figure of 39,495 rather than a margin. The figure is absent rather than corrected: there is no right value to put here.
• revenue is annual, not TTM
• operating income is annual, not TTM
• revenue period ends 2025-06-30 (471 days ago) - the tag chain found nothing recent, so treat this row as unscored
• no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2023-06-30); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
• the market value here was 128.6M: 58.2M shares from the filing at the quoted price. The price feed reports 813.7K shares, and that count at this same price gives 1.8M, which is the value the feed itself reports. So the two counts are of different things — a depositary receipt against the ordinary shares behind it, or a count filed in thousands — and the count the price belongs to is used
• there is no operating profit to value; valuation rests on EV/revenue (33.3x) instead
• analyst estimate not used: trailing EPS is not positive, so a growth rate would be meaningless
• quality DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 5 inputs could be computed (operating margin, roic, owner earnings, cash operating margin not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
• durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage