Every figure this model derived for BOTX, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-03-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
0
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2017-06-30
cash
956,154
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-03-31
current assets
1,104,556
AssetsCurrent
2026-03-31
current liabilities
2,011,235
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-03-31
equity
-1,358,533
StockholdersEquity
2026-03-31
interest expense
75,901
InterestExpense
2026-03-31
ocf
390,193
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-03-31
revenue
4,481,029
Revenues
2026-03-31
sbc
0
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-03-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
BOTX on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
12.34
current ratio
0.55
current ratio reported
0.55
deferred revenue growth
-26.29
dilution pct
0.36
fcf margin
8.71
growth cv
0.67
interest cover
3.98
operating margin
6.74
owner earnings margin
8.71
revenue growth
-31.65
revenue growth per share
-31.89
rule of 40
-24.91
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about BOTX's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
operating income is annual, not TTM
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2017-06-30); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2026-05-14 (108 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
invested capital is -1M (cash exceeds equity plus debt), so return on capital is unbounded rather than undefined; scored as maximal
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions