Every figure this model derived for BORR, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
300,000
PaymentsToAcquireOtherPropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-06-30
cash
225,400,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
596,800,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
235,700,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
961,600,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
210,900,000
InterestExpenseDebt
2025-12-31
ocf
251,900,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-12-31
revenue
1,020,800,000
Revenues
2025-12-31
sbc
11,300,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2025-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
BORR on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
47.16
current ratio
2.79
current ratio reported
2.53
deferred revenue growth
-49.53
dilution pct
3.97
ebit yoy
-13.92
fcf margin
24.65
growth cv
1.19
interest cover
1.53
net debt ebitda
4.81
operating margin
31.55
owner earnings margin
23.54
revenue growth
1.01
revenue growth per share
-2.84
roic
7.9
rule of 40
32.56
sbc pct revenue
1.11
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about BORR's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2025-12-31 (242 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: gross margin stability