Basel Medical Group Ltd (BMGL)

Every figure this model derived for BMGL, the value it took, and the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked against the filing rather than taken on trust. As at 2025-06-30.

The figures, and where each came from

This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.

The ratios

The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up BMGL on one particular measure came for.

Everything else this filing tags

236 more elements from BMGL's own XBRL that this model has no measure for, newest reading each, largest first. Nothing here is converted, added up or renamed — it is the filing's own element names and the filing's own numbers.

What to be careful about

What this model itself distrusts about BMGL's figures. Written by the derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.

• presents no operating result, and rebuilding it from the statement missed the reported pre-tax profit by 39.39% of revenue, so it is refused rather than used
• revenue is annual, not TTM
• no operating income found in XBRL
• revenue period ends 2025-06-30 (472 days ago) - the tag chain found nothing recent, so treat this row as unscored
• no current stock compensation tagged; treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
• the market value here was 144.7M: 37.6M shares from the filing at the quoted price. The price feed reports 1.6M shares, and that count at this same price gives 6.0M, which is the value the feed itself reports. So the two counts are of different things — a depositary receipt against the ordinary shares behind it, or a count filed in thousands — and the count the price belongs to is used
• analyst estimate not used: trailing EPS is not positive, so a growth rate would be meaningless
• quality DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 5 inputs could be computed (operating margin, roic, cash operating margin not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
• valuation rests on 1 of 2 inputs; not tagged: ev ebit
• durability DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, contracted coverage, gross margin stability, cash flow stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
• growth DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 4 inputs could be computed (revenue growth, sustained growth, margin trend, margin recent not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
• 3 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (quality, durability, growth -- 60% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left