BLUM HOLDINGS, INC. (BLMH)

Every figure this model derived for BLMH, the value it took, and the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked against the filing rather than taken on trust. As at 2025-09-30.

The figures, and where each came from

This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.

Figure	Value	XBRL tag	As at
capex	37,000	`PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment`	2025-09-30
cash	388,000	`CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue`	2025-09-30
current assets	1,741,000	`AssetsCurrent`	2025-09-30
current liabilities	25,445,000	`LiabilitiesCurrent`	2025-09-30
equity	-11,879,000	`StockholdersEquity`	2025-09-30
interest expense	756,000	`InterestPaidNet`	2024-12-31
ocf	-1,749,000	`NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities`	2025-09-30
revenue	13,622,000	`RevenueFromContractWithCustomerExcludingAssessedTax`	2025-09-30
sbc	28,000	`ShareBasedCompensation`	2025-09-30

The ratios

The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up BLMH on one particular measure came for.

Ratio	Value
cash operating margin	45.71
current ratio	0.07
current ratio reported	0.07
dilution pct	63.32
fcf margin	-13.11
interest cover	7.12
net debt ebitda	0.76
operating margin	39.51
owner earnings margin	-13.32
sbc pct revenue	0.21

What to be careful about

What this model itself distrusts about BLMH's figures. Written by the derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.

operating income is annual, not TTM
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2025-11-13 (290 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
invested capital is -7M (cash exceeds equity plus debt), so return on capital is unbounded rather than undefined; scored as maximal
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, contracted coverage not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (revenue growth, sustained growth not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
3 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability, growth -- 55% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left