Every figure this model derived for BLK, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
BLK on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
43.34
dilution pct
6.11
ebit cagr
9.93
ebit yoy
18.39
ev ebit
20.67
ev owner earnings
89.47
ev sales
6.73
fcf margin
12.88
growth cv
0.73
interest cover
16.37
net debt ebitda
0.22
operating margin
32.57
owner earnings margin
7.52
revenue growth
26.54
revenue growth per share
19.26
roic
11.73
rule of 40
59.11
sbc pct revenue
5.35
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about BLK's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (contracted coverage, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
resilience rests on 2 of 3 inputs; not tagged: liquidity
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: sustained growth