Every figure this model derived for BETR, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
1,054,000
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-06-30
cash
205,857,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
2,554,806
AssetsCurrent
2023-06-30
current liabilities
20,267,234
LiabilitiesCurrent
2023-06-30
equity
57,897,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
25,156,000
InterestPaidNet
2026-06-30
ocf
-155,100,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
190,374,000
RevenuesNetOfInterestExpense
2026-06-30
sbc
50,527,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
BETR on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-51.74
current ratio
0.13
current ratio reported
0.13
deferred revenue growth
468.84
dilution pct
1.63
fcf margin
-82.02
growth cv
8.85
interest cover
-6.42
operating margin
-84.86
owner earnings margin
-108.57
revenue growth
48.74
revenue growth per share
46.35
rule of 40
-36.12
sbc pct revenue
26.54
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about BETR's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
operating income last tagged 2023-12-31, 912 days before the revenue period (2026-06-30); dropped rather than divided by current revenue
no operating income tagged; derived as revenue minus CostsAndExpenses
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality rests on 4 of 5 inputs; not tagged: roic
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: gross margin stability
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: sustained growth