BETA Technologies, Inc. (BETA)

Every figure this model derived for BETA, the value it took, and the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked against the filing rather than taken on trust. As at 2026-06-30.

The figures, and where each came from

This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.

The ratios

The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up BETA on one particular measure came for.

Everything else this filing tags

196 more elements from BETA's own XBRL that this model has no measure for, newest reading each, largest first. Nothing here is converted, added up or renamed — it is the filing's own element names and the filing's own numbers.

What to be careful about

What this model itself distrusts about BETA's figures. Written by the derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.

• WITHHELD: net margin -- net margin came out at -1,914% against a scale that tops out near 1,500%, which is arithmetic on a revenue figure of 44,842,000 rather than a margin. The figure is absent rather than corrected: there is no right value to put here.
• the market value here was 664.4M: 37.6M shares from the filing at the quoted price. The price feed reports 225.4M shares, and that count at this same price gives 4.0B, which is the value the feed itself reports. So the two counts are of different things — a depositary receipt against the ordinary shares behind it, or a count filed in thousands — and the count the price belongs to is used
• there is no operating profit to value; valuation rests on EV/revenue (60.2x) instead
• analyst estimate not used: trailing EPS is not positive, so a growth rate would be meaningless
• durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: worst year
• growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: sustained growth