Azitra, Inc. (AZTR)

Every figure this model derived for AZTR, the value it took, and the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked against the filing rather than taken on trust. As at 2025-12-31.

The figures, and where each came from

This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.

Figure	Value	XBRL tag	As at
capex	67,593	`PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment`	2026-06-30
cash	6,727,810	`CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue`	2026-06-30
current assets	7,443,822	`AssetsCurrent`	2026-06-30
current liabilities	1,530,709	`LiabilitiesCurrent`	2026-06-30
equity	7,334,339	`StockholdersEquity`	2026-06-30
interest expense	10,602	`InterestExpenseNonoperating`	2026-06-30
ocf	-11,105,767	`NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities`	2026-06-30
revenue	0	`RevenueFromContractWithCustomerExcludingAssessedTax`	2025-12-31
sbc	33,865	`ShareBasedCompensation`	2026-06-30

The ratios

The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up AZTR on one particular measure came for.

Ratio	Value
current ratio	4.86
current ratio reported	4.86
dilution pct	754.52
interest cover	-1164.7
revenue growth	-100.0
revenue growth per share	-100.0
roic	-1604.41

What to be careful about

What this model itself distrusts about AZTR's figures. Written by the derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.

no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 5 inputs could be computed (operating margin, sbc discipline, owner earnings, cash operating margin not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (contracted coverage, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 4 inputs could be computed (sustained growth, margin trend, margin recent not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
4 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (quality, valuation, durability, growth -- 85% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left