Every figure this model derived for AXIL, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-05-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
79,385
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-05-31
cash
4,462,040
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-05-31
current assets
14,342,848
AssetsCurrent
2026-05-31
current liabilities
4,502,533
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-05-31
equity
13,144,217
StockholdersEquity
2026-05-31
interest expense
3,757
InterestPaidNet
2026-05-31
ocf
-9,635
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-05-31
revenue
30,847,570
Revenues
2026-05-31
sbc
785,160
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-05-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
AXIL on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
13.0
current ratio
3.49
current ratio reported
3.19
deferred revenue growth
-48.59
dilution pct
0.48
ebit yoy
156.34
fcf margin
-0.29
growth cv
1.82
interest cover
792.4
operating margin
9.65
owner earnings margin
-2.83
revenue growth
17.48
revenue growth per share
16.93
roic
26.66
rule of 40
27.13
sbc pct revenue
2.55
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about AXIL's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions