Every figure this model derived for AXG, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-03-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
186,000
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-03-31
cash
22,604,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-03-31
current assets
37,659,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-03-31
current liabilities
24,363,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-03-31
equity
25,174,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-03-31
interest expense
5,000
InterestExpenseNonoperating
2025-03-31
ocf
-15,335,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-03-31
revenue
28,048,000
Revenues
2026-03-31
sbc
3,221,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-03-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
AXG on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-34.41
current ratio
1.55
current ratio reported
1.55
dilution pct
675.53
ev owner earnings
-14.16
ev sales
9.46
fcf margin
-55.34
growth cv
1.74
interest cover
-2600.8
operating margin
-46.36
owner earnings margin
-66.82
revenue growth
894.96
revenue growth per share
28.29
roic
-70.93
rule of 40
848.6
sbc pct revenue
11.48
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about AXG's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
operating income last tagged 2024-03-31, 730 days before the revenue period (2026-03-31); dropped rather than divided by current revenue
no operating income tagged; derived as revenue minus OperatingExpenses
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
there is no operating profit to value; valuation rests on EV/revenue (9.5x) instead
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (contracted coverage, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions