Every figure this model derived for AUC, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2024-07-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
5,086
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2024-07-31
cash
7,815,884
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2025-04-30
current assets
8,687,975
AssetsCurrent
2025-04-30
current liabilities
278,073
LiabilitiesCurrent
2025-04-30
equity
8,409,902
StockholdersEquity
2025-04-30
ocf
-2,175,251
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-04-30
revenue
620,000
Revenues
2024-07-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
AUC on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-206.35
current ratio
41.75
current ratio reported
31.24
deferred revenue growth
-22.89
dilution pct
6.43
ev owner earnings
-50.54
ev sales
177.73
fcf margin
-351.67
growth cv
20.28
operating margin
-208.93
owner earnings margin
-351.67
revenue growth
-74.69
revenue growth per share
-76.22
roic
-121.24
rule of 40
-283.62
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about AUC's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
newest fact in the filing is 2025-04-30 (1y old); this company's data is not usable and the scores below should be ignored
revenue is annual, not TTM
revenue period ends 2024-07-31 (758 days ago) - the tag chain found nothing recent, so treat this row as unscored
no current stock compensation tagged; treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
there is no operating profit to value; valuation rests on EV/revenue (177.7x) instead
no debt and no profit, so interest cover cannot be measured; scored on cash runway instead: 8M of net cash against a 2M annual burn is 3.5 years
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
no interest expense tagged while 0M of debt is on the balance sheet, so interest cover is unmeasured rather than perfect